Phantom Damages Reform – S.B. 251
Addresses both the definition of recoverable damages and the evidence
Addresses both the definition of recoverable damages and the evidence admissible to establish the value of medical treatment. Establishes that the reasonable value of past treatment cannot exceed the amounts actually paid to the provider. For future treatment or services that have been rendered but are still owed, the reasonable value cannot exceed the amounts necessary to satisfy the charges. Admissible evidence to show the value of past medical treatment under the bill includes only the sums paid to satisfy the providers’ charges; amounts discounted or written off cannot be considered. Evidence addressing the value of treatment for which payment is still owed or future medical care cannot include figures exceeding what providers would receive if the claims were submitted to a health insurer or government-sponsored program that covers the plaintiff. Finally, the bill abrogates the common law collateral source rule as it applies to medical expense damages.
Latest News
View all news
Louisiana’s “Judicial Hellhole®” Status Costs Residents $965 Annually In “Tort Tax”
Nuclear Verdicts® and Insurance Fraud Plague State’s Legal System
King County Courts Named ‘Judicial Hellhole®’ for First Time
New Report Ranks Seattle-Area Courts Among Worst in US
Michigan’s Legal Climate Kills 97,000 Jobs Annually, New Report Reveals
$1,046/Person ‘Tort Tax’ — Court Expands Liability, Michiganders Pay
Show Me Your Lawsuit: St. Louis Ranks 7th in ‘Judicial Hellholes®’ Report
Courts Threaten Preemie Formula Access, Residents Pay $1,475/Person/Year ‘Tort Tax’
Cook County’s $21.3 Billion Problem: Lawsuit Abuse
Report Ranks County 6th Worst ‘Judicial Hellhole®’
California’s Judicial Hellhole® Status: Where Innovation Meets Litigation
Lawsuit Abuse Costs Every Californian $2,300 Annually, Kills 825,000 Jobs