Third-Party Litigation Financing

Third-party litigation financing (TPLF), or lawsuit funding, is the practice of investors buying an interest in the outcome of a lawsuit, and has become a multi-billion-dollar industry.

The Problem

Third party litigation financing raises ethical concerns by allowing funders to interfere with litigation decisions, which compromises attorney independence and raises costs for litigants.

Economic impacts include:

Hidden Money Pours Into Litigation: Third Party Litigation Funding

“Civil litigation provides a means of resolving disputes between parties, those named in a lawsuit as plaintiffs and defendants. Common law doctrines traditionally prohibited ‘strangers’ to a lawsuit from meddling in litigation or having a financial interest in the outcome due to the potential for litigation abuse. As those principles have fallen by the wayside, outside investors have poured money into civil litigation.”

Read more in the Judicial Hellholes® “Closer Looks” section on third-party litigation financing.

ATRA’s Position

If third party litigation financing continues, regulations should be put in place that increase transparency for litigants and maintains the integrity of the judicial system.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Third-Party Litigation Financing

No related legislation or reform items to display.



Third-Party Litigation Financing News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Third-Party Litigation Financing

Washington State Lawmakers Should Shine a Light on Secret Lawsuit Investors

This op-ed was published by DC Journal State lawmakers in Washingto...

State Tort Laws Negatively Impacting Economies Outlined for DOJ in ATRA Letter

Today, the American Tort Reform Association provided the Department of Jus...

Montana Emerges As National Tort Reform Leader in ATRA’s 2025 “Legislative HeatCheck”

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named Montana a 2025 “Tort Ref...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Third-Party Litigation Financing
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Bio-Lab, Inc. v. Fannie Tartt et al.
(GA, filed January 20, 2026): Arguing that traditional tort law and persuasive decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and numerous state high courts do ...
Georgia
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Sanctionable: The unsupported, exaggerated, and suspicious claims plaguing our nation’s courts
There is growing concern that many lawsuits filed in our nation’s courts are unsupported, involve manufactured or exaggerated injuries, or stem from ...
California, Florida, Louisiana, New York, Pennsylvania
Lyon v. Riverside Methodist Hospital et. al.
(OH., filed October 7, 2025): Arguing that the Court should review the lower court’s decision because the Court should comprehensively address the co...
Ohio
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Atlas Turner, Inc. v. Welch
(U.S., filed September 22, 2025): Arguing the Court should review the use of receiverships by the South Carolina asbestos court.  The receivership pr...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Letter to House Judiciary Committee re: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act
This letter was submitted on behalf of the American Tort Reform Association to express our support for H.R. 5437, the “Protection of Lawful Commerce ...
California
Letter to DOJ re: RFI on State Laws Having Significant Adverse Effects on the National Economy or Interstate Commerce
Re: Request for Information on State Laws Having Significant Adverse Effects on the National Economy or Significant Adverse Effects on Interstate Com...
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
(U.S., filed September 12, 2025): Arguing that the Louisiana coastal litigation proves the importance of federal officer removal.  The Government law...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Suncor Energy Inc., et. al. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et. al.
(U.S., filed September 12, 2025): Urging the Court to grant the petition for certiari.  Arguing that global climate change is not traditional st...
SCOTUS
  • Court Granted Cert iconCourt Granted Cert
Sommerville v. Union Carbide and Covestro LLC
(4th Circ., filed September 9, 2025): Supporting rehearing en banc. Arguing that Article III standing requires an injury that is concrete and particu...
4th Circuit
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
Ortiz v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC
(CA., filed September 4, 2025): Urging the court to review the lower court’s decision because in combination with the decision in Gilead, it threaten...
California
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.