Seatbelt Evidence Admissibility

Juries should be permitted to consider seatbelt use when determining fault and damages in personal injury cases involving automobile crashes.

The Problem

In many states, evidence of whether a plaintiff was wearing a seatbelt is inadmissible in court, even though it directly impacts the extent of injuries and damages claimed. This creates an incomplete picture for juries and unfairly penalizes defendants.

ATRA’s Position

Permit seatbelt evidence to be admitted in court to ensure fair and accurate determinations of fault and damages.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Seatbelt Evidence Admissibility
Seat Belt Evidence Admissibility: S.B. 30 (2019)
In actions arising out the design, construction, manufacture, distribution, or sale of a motor vehicle factory equipped with a safety belt, failure to...
Missouri
Seat Belt Admissibility: H.B. 4 (2003)

Repealed statute forbidding any evidence of lack of seat belt use in auto accident cases.

Texas
Seat Belt Evidence Reform: S.B. 80 (2004)

Permitted evidence to be introduced of plaintiffs non-seat belt use for purposes of reducing noneconomic damages.

Ohio
Seat Belt Admissibility: H.B. 1015 (2013)
Sets out that the use or nonuse of seat belts shall be submitted into evidence in any civil suit in Oklahoma unless the plaintiff in such suit is a ch...
Oklahoma
Seat Belt Admissibility: HB 1015 (2013)
Sets out that the use or nonuse of seatbelts shall be submitted into evidence in any civil suit in Oklahoma unless the plaintiff in such suit is a chi...
Oklahoma
Seat Belt Evidence Admissibility – S.B. 439
Displaces a longstanding provision that had excluded seat belt non-usage evidence for any purpose if the claimant stipulated to a reduction of dama...
West Virginia


Seatbelt Evidence Admissibility News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Seatbelt Evidence Admissibility

Georgia’s Historic Tort Reform Wins National Recognition in ATRA’s 2025 “Legislative HeatCheck”

The American Tort Reform Association named the Georgia legislature a “Tort...

Gov. Kemp Signs Major Tort Reform Bills in ‘Judicial Hellhole’ Georgia

Today, the American Tort Reform Association celebrates Gov. Brian Kemp sig...

Georgia Legislature Passes Landmark Tort Reform Bill

Today, Georgia lawmakers signed off on a critical tort reform measure aime...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Seatbelt Evidence Admissibility
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Blade v. Sig Saurer
(E.D. Pa., filed April 6, 2026): Arguing that the court should grant Sig Saurer’s motion for reconsideration because Mallory upends the jurisdictiona...
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Suquilanda v. Skyway Roofing, Inc.
(Ma., filed March 18, 2026): Urging the court to decline to recognize a new cause of action permitting employees of a subcontractor to sue a contract...
Massachusetts
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Letter Urging Veto or Amendments to House Bill 449 / Senate Bill 229 in Virginia
...
Corporate Flight from Delaware: The Impact of Escalating Shareholder Litigation and Legal Uncertainty
Unpredictable court rulings and a wave of lawyer-driven, profit-seeking litigation are destabilizing Delaware’s historic dominance for corporat...
Delaware
New York Local Legal Services Advertising 2024-2025
Trial lawyers and aggregators increasingly spend large sums of money on television, digital, and print advertising to recruit new clients. In 2025, i...
New York
Murphy v. Rio Rancho Center
(New Mex. Ct. App., filed March 5, 2026): Arguing that the double-digit punitive multipliers likely violate due process. The U.S. Supreme Court has s...
New Mexico
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Monsanto v. Durnell
(U.S., filed March 2, 2026): Arguing that requirements for herbicide labeling should not be made case-by-case in litigation sparked by a flawed IARC ...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Cowan v. Dr. Slann et.al.
(N.D., filed February 23, 2026): Arguing that reasonable limits on medical liability improve the health care system for doctors and patients and Nort...
North Dakota
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Oregon Local Legal Services Advertising 2021-2025
Trial lawyers and aggregators increasingly spend large sums of money on television, digital,and print advertising to recruit new clients. In 2025, it...
Oregon
The Junk Science Playbook
The Machine That Sparks and Supports Mass Tort LitigationIntroduction and Executive SummaryMass tort litigation is a sprawling, profit-driven...



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.