Product Liability

Product liability law is meant to compensate persons injured by defective products and to deter manufacturers from marketing such products.

The Problem

Product liability laws in some states fail to send clear signals to manufacturers about how to avoid liability, and hold manufacturers liable for failure to adopt certain designs when the manufacturers neither knew, nor could have anticipated, the risk.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports legislation that: governs all product liability actions, irrespective of the theory on which they are brought, so that plaintiffs cannot evade the law by inventing new theories of recovery; permits a plaintiff to recover damages only upon proof that the product was defective and that the defect was the cause of the harm; sets out clear rules for determining when a product is defective; provides clear standards for establishing liability based on manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects; provides clear rules requiring proof of causation.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Product Liability
Product Liability Reform: SB 241 (1986).
Confirms that under California law, products like foods high in cholesterol, alcohol, and cigarettes, which are inherently unsafe and which ordinary c...
California
Products Liability Reform/Innocent Seller: S.B. 184 (2011).
Known as the Alabama Small Business Protection Act, S.B. 184 adds protection for Alabama’s retailers against product liabilty suits.  The suits ...
Alabama
Product Liability Reform: HB 160 (1994).
Provides for a 15-year statute of repose in civil actions brought against design and construction professionals.  The statute would begin to run from ...
Alaska


Product Liability News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Product Liability

The High Cost of Junk Science Verdicts in Los Angeles

This op-ed was authored by ATRA’s Lauren Sheets Jarrell and was orig...

Fraud on the Rise: New ATRA Report Exposes Systemic Lawsuit Abuse in Civil Courts

A new report released today by the American Tort Reform Association reveal...

American Tort Reform Association Applauds House Effort to Curb Abusive Lawsuits Targeting Manufacturers

The American Tort Reform Association announced its support for the Protect...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Product Liability
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Schneider Electric USA v. Williams; Union Carbide Corp. v. Schneider Electric USA
(KY., filed July 23, 2024): Arguing against the adoption of “take-home” exposure liability in asbestos cases. View Full Amicus Brief ...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Medical Marijuana, Inc., Et. Al. v. Horn
(U.S., filed July 15, 2024): Arguing that permitting private plaintiffs to recover damages from personal injuries conflicts with RICO’s plain text. Al...
SCOTUS
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
(U.S., filed May 22, 2024): Arguing that the Court should grant the petition for certiari to reaffirm that foreseeability is not a substitute for prox...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
City of Huntington, West Virginia and Cabell County Commission v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation
(W.V., filed May 20, 2024): Arguing that public nuisance traditionally has been limited to conduct that interferes with the use of real property.  The...
West Virginia
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Beinvenu et. al. v. The Society of the Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Lafayette et.al.
(La., filed May 20, 2024): Urging the court to not overturn their previous decision in the case.  Arguing that the Court’s original decision was not b...
Louisiana
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
The People of the State of Michigan v. Eli Lilly & Co.
(MI., filed May 1, 2024): Arguing that the Michigan Supreme Court correctly decided previous cases based on the plain language of Michigan’s consumer ...
Michigan
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Legal Services Advertising – Georgia – 2019-2023
In 2023, it is estimated that $2.4 billion was spent on more than 26 million local legal services television, radio, print ads or billboards solicitin...
Georgia
Legal Services Advertising – Pennsylvania – 2019-2023
In 2023, it is estimated that $2.4 billion was spent on more than 26 million local legal services television, radio, print ads or billboards solicitin...
Pennsylvania
Campaign Finance Analysis — Plaintiffs’ Firms and PAC Contributions — Pennsylvania — 2017-2023
The American Tort Reform Association’s campaign finance analysis report on plaintiffs’ firms and PAC contributions in Pennsylvania, 2017-2...
Pennsylvania
Sunoco LP, et al., v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.; and Shell PLC v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et. al.
(U.S., Filed April 1, 2024): Arguing that global climate change is not traditional state tort or consumer law.  The development, funding and litigatio...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.