Product Liability

Product liability law is meant to compensate persons injured by defective products and to deter manufacturers from marketing such products.

The Problem

Product liability laws in some states fail to send clear signals to manufacturers about how to avoid liability, and hold manufacturers liable for failure to adopt certain designs when the manufacturers neither knew, nor could have anticipated, the risk.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports legislation that: governs all product liability actions, irrespective of the theory on which they are brought, so that plaintiffs cannot evade the law by inventing new theories of recovery; permits a plaintiff to recover damages only upon proof that the product was defective and that the defect was the cause of the harm; sets out clear rules for determining when a product is defective; provides clear standards for establishing liability based on manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects; provides clear rules requiring proof of causation.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Product Liability
Product Liability Reform: HB 1270 (1993).
Requires product liability cases to be based on a design, manufacturing or warning defect, or breach of an express warranty, which caused the product ...
Mississippi
Product Liability Reform: Venue Reform: HB 4508 (1995)

Provides venue control in product liability cases.

Michigan
Product Liability Reform: SB 344 (1995)
Bars application of the rule of joint and several liability in product liability cases.  Provides statutory defenses to product liability claims, incl...
Michigan
Product Liability Reform: LD 346 (1996).
Provides that “subsequent remedial measures” or steps taken after an accident to repair or improve the site of injury are not admissible as evidence o...
Maine
Product Liability Reform: SB 684 (1988).
Provides that a product may be unreasonably dangerous only because of one or more of the following characteristics: (a) defective construction or comp...
Louisiana
Product Liability Reform: HB 1741 (1995).
Bars application of the rule of joint and several liability in product liability cases.  Provides a rebuttable presumption that a product is not defec...
Indiana
Product Liability Reform: HB 20 (1995).
Establishes affidavit requirements in product liability cases.  Creates a presumption of safety, where manufacturers meet state and federal standards,...
Illinois
Product Liability Reform- Statute of Repose: HF 693 (1997)
Establishes a 15‑year statute of repose for product liability lawsuits not involving fraud, concealment, latent diseases caused by harmful materials, ...
Iowa
Product Liability Reform: HB 775 (1999)
Establishes a 12-year statute of repose for products with a useful life of 10 years or less, unless the product is specifically warranted a useful lif...
Florida
Product Liability Reform: SB 231 (2003).
Provides that a product liability action cannot be taken against a manufacturer or seller of a product if the product was used in a manner other than ...
Colorado


Product Liability News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Product Liability

2nd Circuit Revives Acetaminophen Lawsuits, Overturning Judge Cote’s Rule 702 Ruling 

The American Tort Reform Association today chided the 2nd Circui...

ATRA: High Court Affirms Federal Labeling Standards, Rejects Made-for-Litigation Science

The American Tort Reform Association today issued a statement on yesterday...

The High Cost of Junk Science Verdicts in Los Angeles

This op-ed was authored by ATRA’s Lauren Sheets Jarrell and was orig...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Product Liability
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Carey, II et. al.
(KY., filed August 26, 2025) : Arguing that in a wide range of cases, identification of suspicious claims activity has led to investigations that hav...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Comment on “A Critical Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate” Report
This comment is on behalf of the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA), a broad-based coalition of businesses, associations, and professional firms...
Gill v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
(Pa. App., filed June 23, 2025): Arguing that trial courts must zealously ensure the integrity and fairness of the jury system throughout the trial p...
Pennsylvania
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech Inc.
(E.D. Va., filed August 15, 2025): Arguing that Plaintiffs urge an unprecedented theory that a defendant can violate antitrust law by incidentally a...
Eastern District of Virginia
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Berk v. Choy
(U.S., filed August 7, 2025): Arguing that State legislatures enacted affidavit of merit statutes to prevent meritless lawsuits that threaten the ava...
SCOTUS
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
U.S. ex rel. Penelow v. Janssen Products LP.
(3rd Circ., filed July 21, 2025): Arguing that the qui tam provisions violate Article II’s vesting clause, the Appointments Clause, and the Take Care...
3rd Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Anne Arundel County v. Express Scripts
(Md., filed May 29, 2025): Arguing that the Court should join other states in affirming that public nuisance law cannot be converted into an all-enco...
Maryland
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Geico Casualty Company v. Jilianne Warner, et. al.
(Ky. App., filed May 28, 2025): Arguing that the court erred in finding that heavy motor trucks, such as tow trucks, are inherently dangerous.  The t...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Monsanto v. Durnell
(U.S., filed May 9, 2025): Arguing that the Missouri Court of Appeals and other appellate courts have gutted FIFRA’s express preemption provision, al...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Gill v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 
(Pa. App., filed June 23, 2025) Arguing that trial courts must zealously ensure the integrity and fairness of the jury system throughout the trial pr...



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.