Product Liability

Product liability law is meant to compensate persons injured by defective products and to deter manufacturers from marketing such products.

The Problem

Product liability laws in some states fail to send clear signals to manufacturers about how to avoid liability, and hold manufacturers liable for failure to adopt certain designs when the manufacturers neither knew, nor could have anticipated, the risk.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports legislation that: governs all product liability actions, irrespective of the theory on which they are brought, so that plaintiffs cannot evade the law by inventing new theories of recovery; permits a plaintiff to recover damages only upon proof that the product was defective and that the defect was the cause of the harm; sets out clear rules for determining when a product is defective; provides clear standards for establishing liability based on manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects; provides clear rules requiring proof of causation.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Product Liability
Product Liability Reform: HB 1 (1987).
Provides that a product’s design is not defective if: (1) an injury occurs due to the inherent characteristics of a product, where the characteristics...
Ohio
Product Liability Reform: SB 1495 (1995).

Excludes product sellers from strict liability in product liability actions.

New Jersey
Product Liability Reform: SB 2805 (1987).
Provides that a manufacturer or seller of a product is liable only if the plaintiff proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the product was not...
New Jersey
Product Liability Reform: SB 76 (1993); RSA 359-F.
Establishes a right of indemnification for New Hampshire manufacturers from a claim for damages by the original purchaser of a product, where the prod...
New Hampshire
Product Liability Reform: Study Committee: SB 339 (1992); RSA 411-A.

Establishes a committee to study the impact of product liability on New Hampshire businesses.

New Hampshire
Product Liability Reform: State of the Art Defense: HB 936 (1988).

Provides a state of the art defense for defendants in product liability cases.

New Hampshire
Product Liability Reform: HB 1369 (1995).
Establishes a ten‑year statute of repose in product liability actions.  Provides a government standards defense.  Prohibits the award of punitive dama...
North Dakota
Product Liability Reform: HB 637 (1995); Amended N.C. Gen. Stat. § 99B-1.1.
Provides that there shall be no strict liability in tort for product liability actions.  Provides statutory defenses to product liability claims, incl...
North Carolina
Product Liability Reform: SB 380 (1987).

Provides statutory defenses to product liability claims, including assumption of the risk and misuse of product.

Montana
Product Liability Reform: H.B. 13 (special session) (2004); Amended Miss. Code Ann. § 11-1-63.
Provides that the seller of a product, other than a manufacturer, cannot be held liable unless the seller had substantial control over the harm causin...
Mississippi


Product Liability News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Product Liability

The High Cost of Junk Science Verdicts in Los Angeles

This op-ed was authored by ATRA’s Lauren Sheets Jarrell and was orig...

Fraud on the Rise: New ATRA Report Exposes Systemic Lawsuit Abuse in Civil Courts

A new report released today by the American Tort Reform Association reveal...

American Tort Reform Association Applauds House Effort to Curb Abusive Lawsuits Targeting Manufacturers

The American Tort Reform Association announced its support for the Protect...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Product Liability
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Anne Arundel County v. Express Scripts
(Md., filed May 29, 2025): Arguing that the Court should join other states in affirming that public nuisance law cannot be converted into an all-enco...
Maryland
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Geico Casualty Company v. Jilianne Warner, et. al.
(Ky. App., filed May 28, 2025): Arguing that the court erred in finding that heavy motor trucks, such as tow trucks, are inherently dangerous.  The t...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Monsanto v. Durnell
(U.S., filed May 9, 2025): Arguing that the Missouri Court of Appeals and other appellate courts have gutted FIFRA’s express preemption provision, al...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Gill v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 
(Pa. App., filed June 23, 2025) Arguing that trial courts must zealously ensure the integrity and fairness of the jury system throughout the trial pr...
Drake v. Bayer
(9th Circ., filed March 24, 2025): Arguing that Article III and the Rules Enabling Act preclude construing Rule 23 to permit certification of a class ...
California
9th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
BRP Group, Inc. v. Wagner
(DE, filed April 15, 2025): Arguing that the carveout in the final clause of Section 6 of S.B. 313 amounts to an unconstitutional bill of attainder an...
Delaware
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Newman v. Bayer Inc.
(2nd Circ., filed April 9, 2025): Arguing that Article III and the Rules Enabling Act preclude construing Rule 23 to permit certification of a class l...
2nd Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
The Plaintiffs’ Lawyer Quest for the Holy Grail
One can only imagine the scene inside the plaintiffs’ lawyers’ R&D laboratory for expansive liability theories when they created today’s public nu...
Perlmutter v. Federal Insurance Company, Harold Perenboom, and William Douberley
(Fl., filed March 20, 2025): Section 768.72 of Florida law deliberately altered the common law to raise the evidentiary burden for recovering punitive...
Florida
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis et. al.
(U.S., filed March 12, 2025): Arguing that Rule 23(b)(3) does not circumvent fundamental limitations on federal jurisdiction in class actions.  The co...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.