Product Liability

Product liability law is meant to compensate persons injured by defective products and to deter manufacturers from marketing such products.

The Problem

Product liability laws in some states fail to send clear signals to manufacturers about how to avoid liability, and hold manufacturers liable for failure to adopt certain designs when the manufacturers neither knew, nor could have anticipated, the risk.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports legislation that: governs all product liability actions, irrespective of the theory on which they are brought, so that plaintiffs cannot evade the law by inventing new theories of recovery; permits a plaintiff to recover damages only upon proof that the product was defective and that the defect was the cause of the harm; sets out clear rules for determining when a product is defective; provides clear standards for establishing liability based on manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects; provides clear rules requiring proof of causation.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Product Liability
Product Liability Reform: Statute of Repose: SB 92 (1991).
Establishes a 10-year statute of repose for actions brought against architects, engineers, and builders for design error or faulty construction.  Requ...
Utah
Product Liability Reform: Government Standards Defense: SB 25 (1989).
Includes all the provisions of the 1977 product liability statute, except the eight-year statute of repose, which was ruled unconstitutional.  The bil...
Utah
Product Liability Reform: HB 4 (2003).
Provides for a 15 year statute of repose for product liability cases.  In cases involving latent diseases, the plaintiff must have been exposed within...
Texas
Product Liability Reform: SB 4 (1993).
Requires proof of an economically and technologically feasible safer alternative design available at the time of manufacture in most product liability...
Texas
Products Liability Reform: Regulatory Compliance: HB 2008 / SB 1522 (2011).
Prohibits the award of punitive damages against the seller of the product, with certain exceptions, and prohibits the award of punitive damages agains...
Tennessee
Products Liability Reform: Innocent Seller: HB 2008 / SB 1522 (2011).
Prohibits products liability lawsuits against a retailer unless it exercised substantial control over the design, manufacture, packaging or labeling o...
Tennessee
Product Liability Reform: S.B. 13 (2013)
States that in a product liability action, a manufacturer or seller shall not be liable if the product is inherently unsafe and known to be unsafe by ...
Oklahoma
Products Liability Reform: HB 1603 (2009).

Provides that a manufacturer shall not be liable if the product is inherently unsafe.

Oklahoma
Product Liability Reform Statute of Repose: Am Sub SB 80 (2004).

Provides for a ten-year statute of repose for product liability actions, with certain exceptions.

Ohio
Product Liability Reform: HB 350 (1996).
Amends product liability law to include additional requirements for establishing liability.  Prohibits expanding theories of liability, including ente...
Ohio


Product Liability News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Product Liability

The High Cost of Junk Science Verdicts in Los Angeles

This op-ed was authored by ATRA’s Lauren Sheets Jarrell and was orig...

Fraud on the Rise: New ATRA Report Exposes Systemic Lawsuit Abuse in Civil Courts

A new report released today by the American Tort Reform Association reveal...

American Tort Reform Association Applauds House Effort to Curb Abusive Lawsuits Targeting Manufacturers

The American Tort Reform Association announced its support for the Protect...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Product Liability
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
(U.S., filed September 12, 2025): Arguing that the Louisiana coastal litigation proves the importance of federal officer removal.  The Government law...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Suncor Energy Inc., et. al. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et. al.
(U.S., filed September 12, 2025): Urging the Court to grant the petition for certiari.  Arguing that global climate change is not traditional st...
SCOTUS
  • Court Granted Cert iconCourt Granted Cert
Sommerville v. Union Carbide and Covestro LLC
(4th Circ., filed September 9, 2025): Supporting rehearing en banc. Arguing that Article III standing requires an injury that is concrete and particu...
4th Circuit
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
Ortiz v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC
(CA., filed September 4, 2025): Urging the court to review the lower court’s decision because in combination with the decision in Gilead, it threaten...
California
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Carey, II et. al.
(KY., filed August 26, 2025) : Arguing that in a wide range of cases, identification of suspicious claims activity has led to investigations that hav...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Comment on “A Critical Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate” Report
This comment is on behalf of the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA), a broad-based coalition of businesses, associations, and professional firms...
Gill v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
(Pa. App., filed June 23, 2025): Arguing that trial courts must zealously ensure the integrity and fairness of the jury system throughout the trial p...
Pennsylvania
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech Inc.
(E.D. Va., filed August 15, 2025): Arguing that Plaintiffs urge an unprecedented theory that a defendant can violate antitrust law by incidentally a...
Eastern District of Virginia
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Berk v. Choy
(U.S., filed August 7, 2025): Arguing that State legislatures enacted affidavit of merit statutes to prevent meritless lawsuits that threaten the ava...
SCOTUS
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
U.S. ex rel. Penelow v. Janssen Products LP.
(3rd Circ., filed July 21, 2025): Arguing that the qui tam provisions violate Article II’s vesting clause, the Appointments Clause, and the Take Care...
3rd Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.