Phantom Damages Reform

Problem

The collateral source rule keeps important information relevant to the determination of damages from reaching the jury. It allows plaintiffs to be compensated twice for the same injury.

ATRA's Position:

ATRA supports permitting the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments at trial or requiring awards to be offset by the amount paid to plaintiffs by collateral sources, less the amount paid by the plaintiff to secure the benefit.


Opposition Opinion:

The personal injury bar’s argument in support of the collateral source rule – that a plaintiff should not be penalized for having insurance – fails to take into account the fact the jury should full information when making as determination about damages.

Evidence Admissibility Reform: H.B. 2023 (2011)

Oklahoma|2011

Outlines procedures for unpaid medical bills for personal injury cases. 

[…]

Outlines procedures for unpaid medical bills for personal injury cases.  Allows for payment to be made at the level of actual payment, not what was charged.


[hide]

Unchallenged