Noneconomic Damages

Damages for noneconomic losses are damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of consortium or companionship, and other intangible injuries. These damages involve no direct economic loss and have no precise value. It is very difficult for juries to assign a dollar value to these losses, given the minimal guidance they customarily receive from the court. As a result, these awards tend to be erratic and, because of the highly charged environment of personal injury trials, excessive.

The Problem

The broad and basically unguided discretion given juries in awarding damages for noneconomic loss is the single greatest contributor to the inequities and inefficiencies of the tort liability system. It is a difficult issue to address objectively because of the emotions involved in cases of serious injury and because of the financial interests of plaintiffs’ lawyers.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports a $250,000 limit on the award of noneconomic damages.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Noneconomic Damages
Noneconomic Damages Reform: HB 513 (1986).

Limits noneconomic damages to $875,000.

New Hampshire
Medical Liability Reform- Noneconomic Damage Limits: A.B. 1073 (2006)

Limited noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $750,000.

Wisconsin


Noneconomic Damages News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Noneconomic Damages

California Lawmakers Face Renewed Scrutiny for Inaction on Legal Reform, Placed on “Heat Watch” by National Report

Today, the American Tort Reform Association placed California’s legislatur...

Florida House Lands on “Lawsuit Inferno” List After Attempts to Overturn Landmark Legal Reforms

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named the Florida House of Rep...

New York Branded “Lawsuit Inferno” in Legislative HeatCheck

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named New York a “Lawsuit Infe...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Noneconomic Damages
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
In re National Opiate Litigation
(Oh., filed January 8, 2024): Arguing that the Ohio Product Liability Act, as amended in 2005 and2007, supersedes this Court’s divided opinion in City...
Ohio
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Coinbase Inc. v. Suski
(U.S., filed December 22, 2023) Arguing that the effect of a subsequent contract on a prior arbitration agreement that remains in effect is a question...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Peninsula Pathology Associates v. American International Industries
(4th Circuit, filed December 20, 2023): Arguing courts must separate sound science from made-for-litigation results.  For courts to diligently exercis...
4th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Alonzo v. John
(Tex., filed December 8, 2023): Arguing that a Court majority opinion should clearly prohibit unsubstantiated anchoring, which produces nuclear verdic...
Texas
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
McKinney v. Goins
(N.C., filed in November 2023): Arguing that the state’s reviver legislation for certain types of claims is unconstitutional. ...
North Carolina
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
In re Purdue Pharma LLP
(U.S., filed October 27, 2023): Arguing that the bankruptcy code authorizes courts to approve nonconsensual third-party release and that third-party r...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Comment in Support of Proposed Amendment to Ohio Rule of Evidence 702
ATRA supports the proposed amendment to more closely align Ohio ATRA supports the proposed amendment to more closely align Ohio Rule of Eviden...
Ohio
Testimony on Proposed New Rule 16.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Outline of American Tort Reform Association Testimony Regarding Proposed New Outline of American Tort Reform Association Testimony R...
Trial Lawyer Playbook Report
Executive Summary In the dynamic landscape of Capitol Hill discussions and evolving policy debates, one topic has emerged as a pivotal concern – ̶...
Rodriguez v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
(TX, filed September 22, 2023): Arguing that the plain language of Chapter 542A forecloses attorneys’ fees where the amount to be awarded in the judgm...
Texas
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.