Noneconomic Damages

Damages for noneconomic losses are damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of consortium or companionship, and other intangible injuries. These damages involve no direct economic loss and have no precise value. It is very difficult for juries to assign a dollar value to these losses, given the minimal guidance they customarily receive from the court. As a result, these awards tend to be erratic and, because of the highly charged environment of personal injury trials, excessive.

The Problem

The broad and basically unguided discretion given juries in awarding damages for noneconomic loss is the single greatest contributor to the inequities and inefficiencies of the tort liability system. It is a difficult issue to address objectively because of the emotions involved in cases of serious injury and because of the financial interests of plaintiffs’ lawyers.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports a $250,000 limit on the award of noneconomic damages.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Noneconomic Damages
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages: SB 270/H 2 (1993)
Limits the award of noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $280,000 for ordinary occurrences, and $500,000 if the claimant has suffered bra...
Michigan
Noneconomic Damages Reform: SB 2078 (1986).
Limits the award of damages for loss of consortium, emotional distress, or embarrassment to $400,000.  The $400,000 limit on damages for embarrassment...
Minnesota
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages: H.B. 393 (2005).

Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to a nonadjustable limit of $350,000 regardless of the number of defendants in the case.

Missouri
Noneconomic Damages Reform: H.B. 13 (special session); Amended Miss. Code Ann. § 11-1-60.

Limits the recovery of noneconomic damages in all civil cases, with the exception of medical liability actions, to $1 million.

Mississippi
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: H.B.2 (special session) (2002); Amended Miss. Code Ann. § 85-5-7.
Limits noneconomic damages to $500,000 until July 1, 2011, $750,000 from July 1, 2011 until July 1, 2017, and $1 million after July 1, 2017, not adjus...
Mississippi
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: H.B. 13 (special session) (2004); Amended Miss. Code Ann. § 11-1-60.
Establishes a hard cap of $500,000 on noneconomic damages in medical liability cases (the $500,000 cap that was passed during a special session in 200...
Mississippi
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: HB 309 (1995): Mont. Code Ann. § 25‑9‑411.

Limits the award of noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases to $250,000.

Montana
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: SB 33 (2011);N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-21.19.
Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $500,000 against all defendants.  The limit is subject to adjustments, every three years star...
North Carolina
Noneconomic Damages Reform: HB 1050 (1995): N.D. Cent. Code. § 32-42-02.

Limits the award of noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $500,000.

North Dakota
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform:
A New Hampshire law setting a $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages in medical liability cases was held unconstitutional in Carson v. Maurer, 424 A.2d...
New Hampshire


Noneconomic Damages News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Noneconomic Damages

California Lawmakers Face Renewed Scrutiny for Inaction on Legal Reform, Placed on “Heat Watch” by National Report

Today, the American Tort Reform Association placed California’s legislatur...

Florida House Lands on “Lawsuit Inferno” List After Attempts to Overturn Landmark Legal Reforms

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named the Florida House of Rep...

New York Branded “Lawsuit Inferno” in Legislative HeatCheck

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named New York a “Lawsuit Infe...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Noneconomic Damages
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Comment in Support of Proposed Amendment to Ohio Rule of Evidence 702
ATRA supports the proposed amendment to more closely align Ohio ATRA supports the proposed amendment to more closely align Ohio Rule of Eviden...
Ohio
Testimony on Proposed New Rule 16.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Outline of American Tort Reform Association Testimony Regarding Proposed New Outline of American Tort Reform Association Testimony R...
Trial Lawyer Playbook Report
Executive Summary In the dynamic landscape of Capitol Hill discussions and evolving policy debates, one topic has emerged as a pivotal concern – ̶...
Rodriguez v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
(TX, filed September 22, 2023): Arguing that the plain language of Chapter 542A forecloses attorneys’ fees where the amount to be awarded in the judgm...
Texas
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Etheridge v. Samsung SDI Co.
(5th Circ., filed September 22, 2023): Arguing that due process requires a “strong relationship” among the defendant, the forum and the litigation. No...
5th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
American Petroleum Institute et. al. v. State of Minnesota
(U.S., filed September 21, 2023): Arguing that global climate change is not traditional state tort or consumer law.  The development, funding and liti...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Hearing on Use of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Process to Address Overwhelming Mass Tort Litigation Thank you for holding this hearing and fo...
Dupuis v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland, Maine
(ME., filed September 15, 2023): Arguing that reviving time-barred claims undermines Maine’s civil justice system.  This Court has repeatedly indicate...
Maine
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
House Committee on Oversight and Reform Hearing on “Unsuitable Litigation: Oversight of Third-Party Litigation Funding”
House Committee on Oversight and Reform – Hearing on “Unsuitable Litigation: Oversight of Third-Party Litigation Funding” ATRA is a ...
Carey v. CSX
(Ky. App., filed September 8, 2023): Arguing that failing to apply the qualified privilege in this case will deter individuals, employers and insurers...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.