Noneconomic Damages

Damages for noneconomic losses are damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of consortium or companionship, and other intangible injuries. These damages involve no direct economic loss and have no precise value. It is very difficult for juries to assign a dollar value to these losses, given the minimal guidance they customarily receive from the court. As a result, these awards tend to be erratic and, because of the highly charged environment of personal injury trials, excessive.

The Problem

The broad and basically unguided discretion given juries in awarding damages for noneconomic loss is the single greatest contributor to the inequities and inefficiencies of the tort liability system. It is a difficult issue to address objectively because of the emotions involved in cases of serious injury and because of the financial interests of plaintiffs’ lawyers.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports a $250,000 limit on the award of noneconomic damages.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Noneconomic Damages

No related legislation or reform items to display.



Noneconomic Damages News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Noneconomic Damages

California Lawmakers Face Renewed Scrutiny for Inaction on Legal Reform, Placed on “Heat Watch” by National Report

Today, the American Tort Reform Association placed California’s legislatur...

Florida House Lands on “Lawsuit Inferno” List After Attempts to Overturn Landmark Legal Reforms

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named the Florida House of Rep...

New York Branded “Lawsuit Inferno” in Legislative HeatCheck

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named New York a “Lawsuit Infe...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Noneconomic Damages
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Cottrell v. Alcon Laboratories
(3rd Cir., filed September 28, 2016): Arguing that the plaintiffs’ speculative claim that they might have paid less for a medication if defendan...
3rd Circuit
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
Eike v. Allergan
(7th Cir., filed October 18, 2016): Arguing that the plaintiffs’ speculative claim that they might have paid less for a medication if defendants...
7th Circuit
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
BNSF v. Tyrell
(US., filed October 28, 2016): Arguing that the Montana Supreme Court improperly applied the Daimler personal jurisdiction requirements, which state t...
SCOTUS
  • Court Granted Cert iconCourt Granted Cert
In re Zoloft Litigation
(3rd Cir., filed October 18, 2016): Arguing that an expert cannot premise a causation analysis on a single statistically-significant association when ...
3rd Circuit
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.