Noneconomic Damages

Damages for noneconomic losses are damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of consortium or companionship, and other intangible injuries. These damages involve no direct economic loss and have no precise value. It is very difficult for juries to assign a dollar value to these losses, given the minimal guidance they customarily receive from the court. As a result, these awards tend to be erratic and, because of the highly charged environment of personal injury trials, excessive.

The Problem

The broad and basically unguided discretion given juries in awarding damages for noneconomic loss is the single greatest contributor to the inequities and inefficiencies of the tort liability system. It is a difficult issue to address objectively because of the emotions involved in cases of serious injury and because of the financial interests of plaintiffs’ lawyers.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports a $250,000 limit on the award of noneconomic damages.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Noneconomic Damages
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA): (1975): Cal. Civ. Code § 333.2.
Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $250,000.  The $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages in medical liability actions does not vi...
California
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: SB 143 (1988): Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-64-302.
Limits the total award of damages to $1,000,000, of which no more than $250,000 can be for noneconomic damages.  The $250,000 limit on noneconomic dam...
Colorado
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: HB 03-1007 (2003).

Limits noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases to $300,000.

Colorado
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages: CS/SB6 (1988): Fla. Stat. §§ 766.207, 766.209.
Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $250,000 in arbitration.  Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $350,000, ...
Florida
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: CS SB 2-D (special session 2003).
Provides for emergency room practitioner limits on noneconomic damages of $150,000 per claimant, with an aggregate of $300,000.  Provides for emergenc...
Florida
Medical Liability Reform/Noneconomic Damages Reform: S.B. 3 (2005).

Limits noneconomic damages to $350,000 per healthcare provider, with an overall aggregate limit of $1.05 million.

Georgia
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: SB 475 (2005).

Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $500,000 per physician and $1 million per hospital.

Illinois
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages: SB 270/H 2 (1993): Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1483.
Limits the award of noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $280,000 for ordinary occurrences, and $500,000 if the claimant has suffered bra...
Michigan
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: S.B. 1115 (2012)

Classifies the loss of household or other services, loss of companionship and loss of consortium as noneconomic damages.

Michigan
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages: H.B. 393 (2005).

Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to a nonadjustable limit of $350,000 regardless of the number of defendants in the case.

Missouri


Noneconomic Damages News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Noneconomic Damages

California Lawmakers Face Renewed Scrutiny for Inaction on Legal Reform, Placed on “Heat Watch” by National Report

Today, the American Tort Reform Association placed California’s legislatur...

Florida House Lands on “Lawsuit Inferno” List After Attempts to Overturn Landmark Legal Reforms

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named the Florida House of Rep...

New York Branded “Lawsuit Inferno” in Legislative HeatCheck

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named New York a “Lawsuit Infe...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Noneconomic Damages
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Anne Arundel County v. Express Scripts
(Md., filed May 29, 2025): Arguing that the Court should join other states in affirming that public nuisance law cannot be converted into an all-enco...
Maryland
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Geico Casualty Company v. Jilianne Warner, et. al.
(Ky. App., filed May 28, 2025): Arguing that the court erred in finding that heavy motor trucks, such as tow trucks, are inherently dangerous.  The t...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Monsanto v. Durnell
(U.S., filed May 9, 2025): Arguing that the Missouri Court of Appeals and other appellate courts have gutted FIFRA’s express preemption provision, al...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Gill v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 
(Pa. App., filed June 23, 2025) Arguing that trial courts must zealously ensure the integrity and fairness of the jury system throughout the trial pr...
Drake v. Bayer
(9th Circ., filed March 24, 2025): Arguing that Article III and the Rules Enabling Act preclude construing Rule 23 to permit certification of a class ...
California
9th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
BRP Group, Inc. v. Wagner
(DE, filed April 15, 2025): Arguing that the carveout in the final clause of Section 6 of S.B. 313 amounts to an unconstitutional bill of attainder an...
Delaware
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Newman v. Bayer Inc.
(2nd Circ., filed April 9, 2025): Arguing that Article III and the Rules Enabling Act preclude construing Rule 23 to permit certification of a class l...
2nd Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
The Plaintiffs’ Lawyer Quest for the Holy Grail
One can only imagine the scene inside the plaintiffs’ lawyers’ R&D laboratory for expansive liability theories when they created today’s public nu...
Perlmutter v. Federal Insurance Company, Harold Perenboom, and William Douberley
(Fl., filed March 20, 2025): Section 768.72 of Florida law deliberately altered the common law to raise the evidentiary burden for recovering punitive...
Florida
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis et. al.
(U.S., filed March 12, 2025): Arguing that Rule 23(b)(3) does not circumvent fundamental limitations on federal jurisdiction in class actions.  The co...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.