Noneconomic Damages

Damages for noneconomic losses are damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of consortium or companionship, and other intangible injuries. These damages involve no direct economic loss and have no precise value. It is very difficult for juries to assign a dollar value to these losses, given the minimal guidance they customarily receive from the court. As a result, these awards tend to be erratic and, because of the highly charged environment of personal injury trials, excessive.

The Problem

The broad and basically unguided discretion given juries in awarding damages for noneconomic loss is the single greatest contributor to the inequities and inefficiencies of the tort liability system. It is a difficult issue to address objectively because of the emotions involved in cases of serious injury and because of the financial interests of plaintiffs’ lawyers.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports a $250,000 limit on the award of noneconomic damages.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Noneconomic Damages
Noneconomic Damages: H.B. 34 (2015)
Limits the amount of damages recoverable in personal injury actions when the injured person dies before judgment or settlement of causes unrelated to ...
Utah
Noneconomic Damages Limit: S.B. 239 (2015)
Replaces English common law causes of action for medical malpractice claims with statutory causes of action, and provides for limits on noneconomic da...
Missouri
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: AB 36 (1995)

Limits the award of noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $350,000, indexed for inflation.

Wisconsin
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: HB 2122 (2003)

Limits the award of noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases to $250,000 to $500,000 depending on the severity of the injuries.

West Virginia
Noneconomic Damages Reform: SB 4630 (1986).
Limits the award of noneconomic damages for bodily injury to .43% times the average annual wage times the plaintiff’s life expectancy (no less than 15...
Washington
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: HB 4 (2003).
Limits the award of noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases to $250,000 against all doctors and health care practitioners and a $250,000 per-...
Texas
Noneconomic Damages Reform: HB 2008 / SB 1522 (2011);Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-102.
Limits noneconomic damages to $750,000 per occurrence in medical liability actions, and a limit of $1 million if the injury or loss is catastrophic in...
Tennessee
Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages: S. 83 (2005).

Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $350,000 per provider, with an overall aggregate limit of $1.05 million.

South Carolina
Noneconomic Damages Reform: SB 323 (1987).
Limits the award of noneconomic damages to $500,000.  The $500,000 limit on noneconomic damages in personal injury and wrongful death actions arising ...
Oregon
Noneconomic Damages Reform- H.B. 2128 (2011), 23 Okl. St. § 61.2:
Reduces the limit on the amount of noneconomic damages that may be awarded for noneconomic loss arising from a claim of bodily injury from $400,000 to...
Oklahoma


Noneconomic Damages News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Noneconomic Damages

California Lawmakers Face Renewed Scrutiny for Inaction on Legal Reform, Placed on “Heat Watch” by National Report

Today, the American Tort Reform Association placed California’s legislatur...

Florida House Lands on “Lawsuit Inferno” List After Attempts to Overturn Landmark Legal Reforms

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named the Florida House of Rep...

New York Branded “Lawsuit Inferno” in Legislative HeatCheck

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named New York a “Lawsuit Infe...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Noneconomic Damages
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Monsanto v. Durnell
(U.S., filed March 2, 2026): Arguing that requirements for herbicide labeling should not be made case-by-case in litigation sparked by a flawed IARC ...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Cowan v. Dr. Slann et.al.
(N.D., filed February 23, 2026): Arguing that reasonable limits on medical liability improve the health care system for doctors and patients and Nort...
North Dakota
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Oregon Local Legal Services Advertising 2021-2025
Trial lawyers and aggregators increasingly spend large sums of money on television, digital,and print advertising to recruit new clients. In 2025, it...
Oregon
The Junk Science Playbook
The Machine That Sparks and Supports Mass Tort Litigation Introduction and Executive Summary Mass tort litigation is a sprawling, profit-driven...
Bio-Lab, Inc. v. Fannie Tartt et al.
(GA, filed January 20, 2026): Arguing that traditional tort law and persuasive decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and numerous state high courts do ...
Georgia
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Sanctionable: The unsupported, exaggerated, and suspicious claims plaguing our nation’s courts
There is growing concern that many lawsuits filed in our nation’s courts are unsupported, involve manufactured or exaggerated injuries, or stem from ...
California, Florida, Louisiana, New York, Pennsylvania
Lyon v. Riverside Methodist Hospital et. al.
(OH., filed October 7, 2025): Arguing that the Court should review the lower court’s decision because the Court should comprehensively address the co...
Ohio
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Atlas Turner, Inc. v. Welch
(U.S., filed September 22, 2025): Arguing the Court should review the use of receiverships by the South Carolina asbestos court.  The receivership pr...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Letter to House Judiciary Committee re: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act
This letter was submitted on behalf of the American Tort Reform Association to express our support for H.R. 5437, the “Protection of Lawful Commerce ...
California
Letter to DOJ re: RFI on State Laws Having Significant Adverse Effects on the National Economy or Interstate Commerce
Re: Request for Information on State Laws Having Significant Adverse Effects on the National Economy or Significant Adverse Effects on Interstate Com...



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.