Medical Liability

In states without reasonable limits on liability, skyrocketing medical liability awards have driven up insurance costs or forced insurers out, causing many physicians to reduce services, leave high-risk specialties, or relocate their practices.

The Problem

In state civil justice systems that lack reasonable limits on liability, multi-million dollar jury awards and settlements in medical liability cases have forced many insurance companies to either leave the market or substantially raise costs. Increasingly, physicians in these states are choosing to stop practicing medicine, abandon high-risk parts of their practices, or move their practices to other states.

ATRA’s Position

To help bring a degree of predictability and fairness to the civil justice system that is critical to solving the growing medical access and affordability crisis, ATRA recommends a medical liability reform packages that includes: (1) a $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages; (2) a sliding scale for attorney’s contingent fees; (3) periodic payment of future damages; and (4) abolition of the collateral source.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Medical Liability
Medical Liability Reform- Noneconomic Damage Limits: A.B. 1073 (2006)

Limited noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $750,000.

Wisconsin
Medical Liability Reform- Emergency Medical Situations: S.B. 3 (2005)
Provided that in claims arising out of the provision of emergency medical care against a hospital emergency department, no physician or health care pr...
Georgia
Medical Liability- Expression of Sympathy: H.B. 393 (2005)

Prohibited statements, writings, or benevolent gestures expressing sympathy by medical providers from being admitted into evidence.

Missouri
Medical Liability Reform- Statute of Limitations for Minors: H.B. 393 (2005)
Specified that actions against physicians and other health care providers for malpractice must be brought within two years of a minor’s eighteenth bir...
Missouri
Medical Liability Reform- Volunteer Immunity: H.B. 393 (2005)

Provided civil immunity from damages for physicians who provide uncompensated medial care (volunteer services).

Missouri
Medical Liability Reform- Expressions of Sympathy: H.B. 24 (2005)

Provided that statements of sympathy, apology, etc. by medical providers are inadmissible as evidence of liability in medical liability cases.

Montana
Medical Liability Reform- Expert Witness Standards: H.B. 64 (2005)
Provided that an expert witness: must be a licensed health care provider in at least one state; routinely treat or routinely treated within the previo...
Montana
Medical Liability Reform- Pretrial Screening Panels: S.B. 214 (2005)
Created a pre-trial screening panel requiring all medical liability cases go before a   three person panel: a judge, an attorney & a health care p...
New Hampshire
Medical Liability Reform- Emergency Situations: S. 83 (2005)
Provided that a physician is not liable for claims arising out of an emergency situation unless the physician was grossly negligent.  Provided that a ...
South Carolina
Medical Liability Reform- Mediation: S. 83 (2005)
Required that prior to filing an action, the plaintiff must file a Notice of Intent to File Suit, and the parties must participate in a court-supervis...
South Carolina


Medical Liability News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Medical Liability

Report: New Mexico Earns “Tort Reform Trailblazer” Title as Lawmakers Tackle Doctor Shortage Crisis

New Mexico earned a “Tort Reform Trailblazer” designation in the American ...

Ohio Lawmakers in “Legislative Limbo” as Mixed Civil Justice Agenda Awaits Action

Ohio lawmakers are in “Legislative Limbo” in the American Tort Reform Asso...

Report: Virginia’s “Lawsuit Inferno” Status Returns as Lawmakers Push Class Actions, Bigger Verdicts

Virginia lawmakers earned a “Lawsuit Inferno” designation for the second c...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Medical Liability
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
(U.S., filed December 4, 2024): Arguing that foreseeability is not a substitute for proximate causation. The petition is emblematic of numerous lawsui...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Gilead Tenofovir Cases, Gilead Sciences v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
(Ca., filed November 4, 2024): Arguing that the novel duty to innovate recognized by the Court of Appeal would flood the judiciary and burden manufact...
California
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Moheball v. Hayes
(N.C. App., filed October 7, 2024): Arguing that statutory limits on noneconomic damages respond to a rise in pain and suffering awards and their unpr...
North Carolina
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Piasa Armory, LLC. v. Raoul
(Il., filed October 7, 2024): Arguing against the elimination of the state’s intrastate forum non conveniens doctrine. Intrastate forum non conveniens...
Illinois
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Sommerville v. Union Carbide Corp.
(4th Circ., filed September 30, 2024): Arguing that Article III standing is a threshold requirement for all claims in federal court.  Medical-monitori...
4th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Gardner v. Norman
(UT., filed August 23, 2024): Arguing that chargemaster rates and other list prices set by healthcare providers, but rarely paid and not actually rece...
Utah
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Uber Sexual Assault Survivors for Legal Accountability and Nevada Justice Association vs. Uber Technologies, Inc.
(Nv., filed August 8, 2024): Arguing that judicial review of ballot initiative petitions is limited to the requirements of NRS 295.009 and Article 19 ...
Nevada
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
The Key School Inc. v. Bunker; Board of Education of Hartford County v. John Doe
(Md., filed August 7, 2024): Arguing that reviving time-barred claims undermines Maryland’s civil justice system and creates turmoil for busines...
Maryland
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Schneider Electric USA v. Williams; Union Carbide Corp. v. Schneider Electric USA
(KY., filed July 23, 2024): Arguing against the adoption of “take-home” exposure liability in asbestos cases. View Full Amicus Brief ...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Medical Marijuana, Inc., Et. Al. v. Horn
(U.S., filed July 15, 2024): Arguing that permitting private plaintiffs to recover damages from personal injuries conflicts with RICO’s plain text. Al...
SCOTUS
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.