Medical Liability

In states without reasonable limits on liability, skyrocketing medical liability awards have driven up insurance costs or forced insurers out, causing many physicians to reduce services, leave high-risk specialties, or relocate their practices.

The Problem

In state civil justice systems that lack reasonable limits on liability, multi-million dollar jury awards and settlements in medical liability cases have forced many insurance companies to either leave the market or substantially raise costs. Increasingly, physicians in these states are choosing to stop practicing medicine, abandon high-risk parts of their practices, or move their practices to other states.

ATRA’s Position

To help bring a degree of predictability and fairness to the civil justice system that is critical to solving the growing medical access and affordability crisis, ATRA recommends a medical liability reform packages that includes: (1) a $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages; (2) a sliding scale for attorney’s contingent fees; (3) periodic payment of future damages; and (4) abolition of the collateral source.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Medical Liability

No related legislation or reform items to display.



Medical Liability News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Medical Liability

Report: New Mexico Earns “Tort Reform Trailblazer” Title as Lawmakers Tackle Doctor Shortage Crisis

New Mexico earned a “Tort Reform Trailblazer” designation in the American ...

Report: Virginia’s “Lawsuit Inferno” Status Returns as Lawmakers Push Class Actions, Bigger Verdicts

Virginia lawmakers earned a “Lawsuit Inferno” designation for the second c...

Ohio Lawmakers in “Legislative Limbo” as Mixed Civil Justice Agenda Awaits Action

Ohio lawmakers are in “Legislative Limbo” in the American Tort Reform Asso...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Medical Liability
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
BP Exploration & Production Incorporated, et al. v. Lake Eugenie Land & Development, Incorporated, et al.,
No. 14-123 (U.S., filed September 2014):  Urging the United States Supreme Court to hear BP’s appeal of critical class action issues stemming from the...
SCOTUS
  • Court Denied Cert iconCourt Denied Cert
Dummitt v. Crane Co.
(N.Y., filed September 2014): Arguing that, Defendants are only responsible for harms caused by their own products and do not have a duty to warn abou...
New York
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. The Super. Ct. of S.F. Cnty.
(Cal., filed September 2014): Arguing that it is improper for California courts to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a company that has no ...
California
  • Court Granted Cert iconCourt Granted Cert
Mobil Co. v. Johnson
(Fl. Distr. Ct. of Appeal of 4th Distr., filed October 2014): Arguing that in any toxic tort case, it is important to assess the dose received by the ...
Florida
  • Case Settled iconCase Settled
Nissan Motor Co. v. Maddox
(KY, filed in October 2014): Arguing that it is improper to award punitive damages to a plaintiff who was injured by a product that met government reg...
Kentucky
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
BP In Re Deepwater Horizon
(US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, filed in December 2014): Arguing that claims administrators should be subject to the same standards of impartiality...
5th Circuit
  • Case Settled iconCase Settled
Rost v. Ford
(Penn., filed in January of 2015):  Arguing that a plaintiff in an asbestos action cannot satisfy the burden of establishing substantial-factor causat...
Pennsylvania
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
In Re Longview Energy Co.
(Tex. Filed in January of 2015): Arguing that the statutory limit on appeal bonds should apply per judgment, not per judgment per party. ...
Texas
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver v. BNSF Railrods
(Cal., filed in March of 2015): Arguing that the California Supreme Court should reject the theory of take-home exposure in asbestos cases. ...
California
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
In Re Urethane
(U.S. Supreme Court, filed in April of 2015): Arguing that the Court must clarify the Rules Enabling Act and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro...
SCOTUS
  • Case Settled iconCase Settled



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.