Medical Liability

In states without reasonable limits on liability, skyrocketing medical liability awards have driven up insurance costs or forced insurers out, causing many physicians to reduce services, leave high-risk specialties, or relocate their practices.

The Problem

In state civil justice systems that lack reasonable limits on liability, multi-million dollar jury awards and settlements in medical liability cases have forced many insurance companies to either leave the market or substantially raise costs. Increasingly, physicians in these states are choosing to stop practicing medicine, abandon high-risk parts of their practices, or move their practices to other states.

ATRA’s Position

To help bring a degree of predictability and fairness to the civil justice system that is critical to solving the growing medical access and affordability crisis, ATRA recommends a medical liability reform packages that includes: (1) a $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages; (2) a sliding scale for attorney’s contingent fees; (3) periodic payment of future damages; and (4) abolition of the collateral source.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Medical Liability
Medical Liability Reform: H.B. 188 (1997)

Establishes a 180 day time limit for prelitigation hearings and permits parties to stipulate bypassing the prelitigation panel process.

Utah
Medical Liability Reform – H.F. 161
Provides, among other things, a limit on noneconomic damages of $250,000.  If the jury determines that there is a substantial or permanent loss or imp...
Iowa
Medical Liability Reform: H.B. 1359 (1993)
Provides a defense from liability for physicians who adhere to standards of practice among health care professionals with similar training and experie...
Maryland
Medical Liability Reform: S.B. 1253 (1993)

Limits liability for health care professionals volunteering health care services at free clinics.

South Dakota
Medical Liability: H.F. 2800 (1992)
A comprehensive health care access act which contains a provision for an absolute defense against medical liability when doctors adhere to practice pa...
Minnesota
Medical Liability: H.B. 733 (1992)
Makes Vermont’s current voluntary arbitration statutes for medical liability claims a mandatory process. The arbitration’s board’s d...
Vermont
Medical Liability Reform: S.B. 2217 (1997)
Requires that a medical liability case must be dismissed without prejudice unless the claimant obtains an admissible expert opinion within three month...
North Dakota
Medical Liability Reform: H.B. 1351 (1997)
Provides that a person brings suit for medical liability waives medical privilege as to medical records, opinions, and information with other physicia...
North Dakota
Statute of Repose for Medical Liability: S.B. 2192 (1998)

Establishes a seven-year statute of repose in medical liability actions and creates exceptions for fraudulent concealment and foreign objects

Mississippi
Medical Monitoring
Overturns the Supreme Court’s decision in Bourgeois v. Green which allowed someone exposed to a “hazardous” substance to recover expenses for medical ...
Louisiana


Medical Liability News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Medical Liability

West Virginia Labeled “Lawsuit Inferno” After Senate Judiciary Committee Blocks Reform Bills, Pushes Lawsuit Expansion

Today, the American Tort Reform Association named the West Virginia Senate...

Pennsylvania & Philly Named Top ‘Judicial Hellholes®’ As Healthcare Crisis Looms”

The American Tort Reform Foundation named the Philadelphia Court of Common...

Liability Shield in Congress – ATRA Urges Quick Action

Last night, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell revealed his HEALS (Hea...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Medical Liability
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Sanctionable: The unsupported, exaggerated, and suspicious claims plaguing our nation’s courts
There is growing concern that many lawsuits filed in our nation’s courts are unsupported, involve manufactured or exaggerated injuries, or stem from ...
California, Florida, Louisiana, New York, Pennsylvania
Lyon v. Riverside Methodist Hospital et. al.
(OH., filed October 7, 2025): Arguing that the Court should review the lower court’s decision because the Court should comprehensively address the co...
Ohio
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Atlas Turner, Inc. v. Welch
(U.S., filed September 22, 2025): Arguing the Court should review the use of receiverships by the South Carolina asbestos court.  The receivership pr...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Letter to House Judiciary Committee re: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act
This letter was submitted on behalf of the American Tort Reform Association to express our support for H.R. 5437, the “Protection of Lawful Commerce ...
California
Letter to DOJ re: RFI on State Laws Having Significant Adverse Effects on the National Economy or Interstate Commerce
Re: Request for Information on State Laws Having Significant Adverse Effects on the National Economy or Significant Adverse Effects on Interstate Com...
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
(U.S., filed September 12, 2025): Arguing that the Louisiana coastal litigation proves the importance of federal officer removal.  The Government law...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Suncor Energy Inc., et. al. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et. al.
(U.S., filed September 12, 2025): Urging the Court to grant the petition for certiari.  Arguing that global climate change is not traditional state t...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Sommerville v. Union Carbide and Covestro LLC
(4th Circ., filed September 9, 2025): Supporting rehearing en banc. Arguing that Article III standing requires an injury that is concrete and particu...
4th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Ortiz v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC
(CA., filed September 4, 2025): Urging the court to review the lower court’s decision because in combination with the decision in Gilead, it threaten...
California
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Carey, II et. al.
(KY., filed August 26, 2025) : Arguing that in a wide range of cases, identification of suspicious claims activity has led to investigations that hav...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2025 ATRA. All rights reserved.