Legal Services Advertising

Trial lawyers and aggregators increasingly spend large sums of money on television, digital, and print advertising to recruit new clients for class action lawsuits. Much of this advertising is conducted by aggregators: businesses that recruit potential plaintiffs and then sell their information to law firms.

The Problem

Consumers see doomsday ads about the lethal effects of medications or even general medical injury, and consequently stop using their medicine. This is often done without consulting a doctor, causing health problems for the patients and increasing litigation risk for the product manufacturers. These over-the-top advertisements from personal injury attorneys with catchy jingles and toll-free numbers pose a serious danger. These ads undermine the simple notion that physicians and health care providers, not personal injury lawyers or the “aggregators” who run the ads for the lawyers, should dispense medical advice. The reason why trial lawyers pump significant money into these ad buys is because, armed with more clients, they can boost settlements and payouts when they go after large corporations. This leads to larger contingency fees for themselves.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports legislation that places reasonable regulations regarding deceptive or misleading lawsuit or legal services advertisements.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Legal Services Advertising

No related legislation or reform items to display.



Legal Services Advertising News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Legal Services Advertising

Lawsuit Abuse Awareness Week 2026: Somebody Paid for That Billboard. It Was You.

You see the ads on the interstate, between innings and during the 11 oR...

New ATRA Report Reveals New York Trial Lawyers Spent $179 Million on Ads Pushing Lawsuits as “Fraudemic” Fuels Soaring Auto Insurance Costs

A new report from the American Tort Reform Association exposes a stag...

New Report Exposes Oregon’s Soaring Trial Lawyer Ad Spending and Rising Litigation Risks

The American Tort Reform Association released a new analysis today reveali...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Legal Services Advertising
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
In Re Longview Energy Co.
(Tex. Filed in January of 2015): Arguing that the statutory limit on appeal bonds should apply per judgment, not per judgment per party. ...
Texas
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver v. BNSF Railrods
(Cal., filed in March of 2015): Arguing that the California Supreme Court should reject the theory of take-home exposure in asbestos cases. ...
California
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
In Re Urethane
(U.S. Supreme Court, filed in April of 2015): Arguing that the Court must clarify the Rules Enabling Act and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro...
SCOTUS
  • Case Settled iconCase Settled
Lompe v. Sunridge
(U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, filed in April 2015).  Arguing that it is improper to use a defendant’s wealth evidence in an uncon...
10th Circuit
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bousaphakeo
(U.S. Supreme Court, filed in April of 2015): Arguing that the Court should grant cert in order to clarify the law and only allow class actions when a...
SCOTUS
  • Court Granted Cert iconCourt Granted Cert
Scapa Dryer Fabrics v. Knight
(Ga., filed in May of 2015).  Arguing that the “any exposure theory” is not sufficient to be causative of mesothelioma. ...
Georgia
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
May v. Air & Liquid Systems, Inc.
(Md., filed in May of 2015): Arguing that a manufacturer does not has a duty to warn with respect to asbestos-containing products manufactured, suppli...
Maryland
  • Court Remanded Case Back to Lower Court iconCourt Remanded Case Back to Lower Court
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. The Super. Ct. of S.F. Cnty.
(Cal., filed June 2015): Arguing that it is improper for California courts to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a company that has no conne...
California
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
Rains v. Stayton
(Ore., filed in July of 2015): Arguing that the state’s statutory limit on noneconomic damages is constitutional and does not infringe on a plaintiff’...
Oregon
  • Court Remanded Case Back to Lower Court iconCourt Remanded Case Back to Lower Court
Spokeo v. Robins
(U.S. Supreme Court, filed in July of 2015): Arguing that a bare violation of a federal statute does not confer Article III standing upon a plaintiff ...
SCOTUS
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.