Legal Services Advertising

Trial lawyers and aggregators increasingly spend large sums of money on television, digital, and print advertising to recruit new clients for class action lawsuits. Much of this advertising is conducted by aggregators: businesses that recruit potential plaintiffs and then sell their information to law firms.

The Problem

Consumers see doomsday ads about the lethal effects of medications or even general medical injury, and consequently stop using their medicine. This is often done without consulting a doctor, causing health problems for the patients and increasing litigation risk for the product manufacturers. These over-the-top advertisements from personal injury attorneys with catchy jingles and toll-free numbers pose a serious danger. These ads undermine the simple notion that physicians and health care providers, not personal injury lawyers or the “aggregators” who run the ads for the lawyers, should dispense medical advice. The reason why trial lawyers pump significant money into these ad buys is because, armed with more clients, they can boost settlements and payouts when they go after large corporations. This leads to larger contingency fees for themselves.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports legislation that places reasonable regulations regarding deceptive or misleading lawsuit or legal services advertisements.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Legal Services Advertising
Legal Advertising – H.B. 1205 (2023)
Prohibits a person or entity issuing a legal services advertisement from doing specified things, including presenting the advertisement as a medical ...
Florida
Attorney Advertising – S.B. 383 (2022)
Sets forth the requirements and limitations for legal advertising consistent with the U.S. Fifth Circuit’s opinion in Public Citizen v. Louisiana Disc...
Louisiana
Attorney Advertising – S.B. 378 (2022)
Prohibits deceptive or misleading advertisements, specifically those presented as a medical alert, health alert, drug alert, or public service announc...
Louisiana
Advertising for Legal Services – S.B. 150 (2022)
Creates law related to legal advertising and the use of protected health information to solicit individuals for legal services.  If the advertisement ...
Kansas
Advertising Restrictions: H. 3008 (2005)

Made using a nickname in attorney advertising a violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act.

South Carolina


Legal Services Advertising News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Legal Services Advertising

Lawsuit Abuse Awareness Week 2026: Somebody Paid for That Billboard. It Was You.

You see the ads on the interstate, between innings and during the 11 oR...

New ATRA Report Reveals New York Trial Lawyers Spent $179 Million on Ads Pushing Lawsuits as “Fraudemic” Fuels Soaring Auto Insurance Costs

A new report from the American Tort Reform Association exposes a stag...

New Report Exposes Oregon’s Soaring Trial Lawyer Ad Spending and Rising Litigation Risks

The American Tort Reform Association released a new analysis today reveali...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Legal Services Advertising
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
2025 Legal Services Advertising: By the Numbers
Legal services advertisers spent $4.1 billion on roughly 30 million ads in 2025, a 47.4% jump over 2024. This one-page breakdown shows where that ...
The Kroger Co. v. Solano
(U.S., filed October 5, 2026): Arguing that review is needed to clarify that federal courts may not certify a Rule 23(b)(3) class containing uninjure...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Rutledge v. Walgreens Co., et. al.
(2nd Circ., filed September 17, 2026): Arguing that a rehearing en banc is needed to restore uniformity in the circuit’s application of Rule 702 and ...
2nd Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
WHB 823 v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
(4th Circ., filed August 31, 2026): Arguing that the District Court’s ruling abandons traditional fault-based tort principles.  Fault-based tort prin...
4th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson; Janssen Biotech, Inc.
(4th Circ., filed August 19, 2026): Arguing that the Court should reject the novel theory of imposing strict liability and reaffirm that Section 2 re...
4th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Mead Johnson & Co. LLC v. Greear
(U.S., filed August 7, 2026): Arguing that the lower court’s holding on specific jurisdiction inexplicably ignores and conflicts with this Court’s de...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Lyle & Bruso v. State Farm
(Ok., filed July 9, 2026): Arguing that allowing the district court’s so-called “protective order” to stand would make Oklahoma a significant nationa...
Oklahoma
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Benavides v. Tesla
(11th Circ., filed July 9, 2026): Arguing that the judgment holds manufacturers to unreasonable standards that will deter innovation and development ...
11th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Drake v. Bayer
(9th Circ., filed May 26, 2026): Arguing that rehearing should be granted to clarify the standards applicable to establishing class-wide injury.  The...
9th Circuit
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
In Re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities Litigation
(6th Circ., filed May 21, 2026): Arguing that Comcast’s limits on class certification provide essential protections for American businesses and inves...
6th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.