Collateral Source

The collateral source rule bars the admissibility of evidence at trial to show that a plaintiff’s losses have been compensated from other sources, such as the plaintiff’s insurance or workers compensation. “Collateral source” refers to damages awarded to plaintiffs for inflated medical expenses that were never actually incurred.

The Problem

The collateral source rule keeps important information relevant to the determination of damages from reaching the jury. It allows plaintiffs to be compensated twice for the same injury.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports permitting the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments at trial or requiring awards to be offset by the amount paid to plaintiffs by collateral sources, less the amount paid by the plaintiff to secure the benefit. Advancing legislation to allow actual evidence of the medical expenses incurred will bring transparency to damage awards for medical bills.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Collateral Source
Collateral Source Rule Reform: SB 394 (1986)
Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments from sources other than life insurance, other insurance for which the plaintiff or...
Indiana
Collateral Source Rule Reform: SB 1200 (1986): 735 Ill. Comp. Stat Ann. § 5/2 –1205.

Provides for awards to be offset for benefits over $25,000, as long as the offset does not reduce the judgment by more than 50%.

Illinois
Collateral Source Rule Reform: HB 745 (1990): Idaho Code Ann. § 6-1606.
Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments.  Provides for awards to be offset to the extent that they include double recoveri...
Idaho
Collateral Source Rule Reform: SF 482 (1987).

Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments.

Iowa
Collateral Source Rule Reform: SB S1 (special session) (1986): Sunset provision (SB 1529) enacted in 1991.
Provides for the payment of valid liens (arising out of claims for payments made from collateral sources for costs and expenses arising from an injury...
Hawaii
Collateral Source Rule: H.B. 1 (1987)

Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments.

Georgia
Collateral Source Rule Reform: SB 465 (1986):
Provides for awards to be offset with broad exclusions.  The collateral source rule reform is unconstitutional.  Smith v. Department of Insurance, 507...
Florida
Collateral Source Rule Reform: HB 6134 (1986): Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 52‑225a.
Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments.  Provides for awards to be offset by the amount paid by collateral sources less a...
Connecticut
Collateral Source Rule Reform: SB 67 (1986)

Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments.  Provides for awards to be offset with broad exclusions.

Colorado
Collateral Source Rule Reform: SB 1055 (1993): Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-565.

Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments in all civil liability cases.

Arizona


Collateral Source News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Collateral Source

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Collateral Source
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Anne Arundel County v. Express Scripts
(Md., filed May 29, 2025): Arguing that the Court should join other states in affirming that public nuisance law cannot be converted into an all-enco...
Maryland
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Geico Casualty Company v. Jilianne Warner, et. al.
(Ky. App., filed May 28, 2025): Arguing that the court erred in finding that heavy motor trucks, such as tow trucks, are inherently dangerous.  The t...
Kentucky
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Monsanto v. Durnell
(U.S., filed May 9, 2025): Arguing that the Missouri Court of Appeals and other appellate courts have gutted FIFRA’s express preemption provision, al...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Gill v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 
(Pa. App., filed June 23, 2025) Arguing that trial courts must zealously ensure the integrity and fairness of the jury system throughout the trial pr...
Drake v. Bayer
(9th Circ., filed March 24, 2025): Arguing that Article III and the Rules Enabling Act preclude construing Rule 23 to permit certification of a class ...
California
9th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
BRP Group, Inc. v. Wagner
(DE, filed April 15, 2025): Arguing that the carveout in the final clause of Section 6 of S.B. 313 amounts to an unconstitutional bill of attainder an...
Delaware
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Newman v. Bayer Inc.
(2nd Circ., filed April 9, 2025): Arguing that Article III and the Rules Enabling Act preclude construing Rule 23 to permit certification of a class l...
2nd Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
The Plaintiffs’ Lawyer Quest for the Holy Grail
One can only imagine the scene inside the plaintiffs’ lawyers’ R&D laboratory for expansive liability theories when they created today’s public nu...
Perlmutter v. Federal Insurance Company, Harold Perenboom, and William Douberley
(Fl., filed March 20, 2025): Section 768.72 of Florida law deliberately altered the common law to raise the evidentiary burden for recovering punitive...
Florida
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis et. al.
(U.S., filed March 12, 2025): Arguing that Rule 23(b)(3) does not circumvent fundamental limitations on federal jurisdiction in class actions.  The co...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.