Attorney General Transparency

In state recoupment litigation against the tobacco industry, most states retained personal injury lawyers on a contingent fee basis to assist them with their litigation. Many of these contracts, inked without competitive bidding, and with little or no outside oversight, were rife with political favoritism, inside dealing, and in at least one case, amid the stench of corruption. Many of these billion-dollar fees (which bore little or no relation to the value of the work performed) are being strategically reinvested into the political process, and into still more litigation.

The Problem

Since the landmark recoupment lawsuits against the tobacco industry, state attorneys general have sought to recover costs from other industries, including firearms and pharmaceuticals, by partnering with the personal injury bar to sue whole industries. The growing trend of “regulation through litigation” presents more opportunities for government retention of personal injury lawyers on a contingent fee basis, and more opportunities for abuse.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports “sunshine” legislation that requires legislative approval of most large contingent fee contacts between government and personal injury lawyers, requires personal injury lawyers to keep track of their time spent on government cases, and reasserts the legislature’s oversight of “regulation through litigation.”

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Attorney General Transparency

No related legislation or reform items to display.



Attorney General Transparency News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Attorney General Transparency

Texas Now on Judicial Hellholes® “Watch List” as Political Lawsuits, Junk Science Spread

The American Tort Reform Foundation today placed Texas on the Judicial Hel...

ATRA Applauds House Oversight Committee Investigation Into the State Energy & Environmental Impact Center at NYU School of Law

The American Tort Reform Association applauds the House Oversight and Gove...

Groups Urge Congressional Scrutiny of D.C. Attorney General’s Use of Private Attorneys

The American Tort Reform Association submitted a letter today to the House...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Attorney General Transparency
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
In Re Longview Energy Co.
(Tex. Filed in January of 2015): Arguing that the statutory limit on appeal bonds should apply per judgment, not per judgment per party. ...
Texas
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver v. BNSF Railrods
(Cal., filed in March of 2015): Arguing that the California Supreme Court should reject the theory of take-home exposure in asbestos cases. ...
California
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
In Re Urethane
(U.S. Supreme Court, filed in April of 2015): Arguing that the Court must clarify the Rules Enabling Act and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro...
SCOTUS
  • Case Settled iconCase Settled
Lompe v. Sunridge
(U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, filed in April 2015).  Arguing that it is improper to use a defendant’s wealth evidence in an uncon...
10th Circuit
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bousaphakeo
(U.S. Supreme Court, filed in April of 2015): Arguing that the Court should grant cert in order to clarify the law and only allow class actions when a...
SCOTUS
  • Court Granted Cert iconCourt Granted Cert
Scapa Dryer Fabrics v. Knight
(Ga., filed in May of 2015).  Arguing that the “any exposure theory” is not sufficient to be causative of mesothelioma. ...
Georgia
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
May v. Air & Liquid Systems, Inc.
(Md., filed in May of 2015): Arguing that a manufacturer does not has a duty to warn with respect to asbestos-containing products manufactured, suppli...
Maryland
  • Court Remanded Case Back to Lower Court iconCourt Remanded Case Back to Lower Court
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. The Super. Ct. of S.F. Cnty.
(Cal., filed June 2015): Arguing that it is improper for California courts to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a company that has no conne...
California
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
Rains v. Stayton
(Ore., filed in July of 2015): Arguing that the state’s statutory limit on noneconomic damages is constitutional and does not infringe on a plaintiff’...
Oregon
  • Court Remanded Case Back to Lower Court iconCourt Remanded Case Back to Lower Court
Spokeo v. Robins
(U.S. Supreme Court, filed in July of 2015): Arguing that a bare violation of a federal statute does not confer Article III standing upon a plaintiff ...
SCOTUS
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.