Attorney General Transparency

In state recoupment litigation against the tobacco industry, most states retained personal injury lawyers on a contingent fee basis to assist them with their litigation. Many of these contracts, inked without competitive bidding, and with little or no outside oversight, were rife with political favoritism, inside dealing, and in at least one case, amid the stench of corruption. Many of these billion-dollar fees (which bore little or no relation to the value of the work performed) are being strategically reinvested into the political process, and into still more litigation.

The Problem

Since the landmark recoupment lawsuits against the tobacco industry, state attorneys general have sought to recover costs from other industries, including firearms and pharmaceuticals, by partnering with the personal injury bar to sue whole industries. The growing trend of “regulation through litigation” presents more opportunities for government retention of personal injury lawyers on a contingent fee basis, and more opportunities for abuse.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports “sunshine” legislation that requires legislative approval of most large contingent fee contacts between government and personal injury lawyers, requires personal injury lawyers to keep track of their time spent on government cases, and reasserts the legislature’s oversight of “regulation through litigation.”

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Attorney General Transparency
Transparency in Private Attorney Contracting: H.B. 1531 (2018)
Provides that the state shall not enter into a contingency fee contract with a private attorney unless certain conditions are met. Also, establishes l...
Missouri
Attorney General Sunshine: H.B. 198 (2018)
Prohibits any contracting body, including all constitutional officers and executive branch agencies with contracting authority, from entering into a c...
Kentucky
Transparency in Private Attorney Contracting: A.B. 27 (2013)

Governs the practice of government hiring private, outside plaintiff attorneys on a contingency fee basis.

Wisconsin
Transparency in Private Attorney Contracting: S.B. 648 (2014)
Ensures that should the state award contingency fee contracts that they are awarded openly and transparently and that the state would receive maximum ...
North Carolina
Transparency in Private Attorney Contracts
This bill codifies the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in Meredith v. Ieyoub.  It says the state cannot compensate attorneys on a contingency fee bas...
Louisiana
Transparency in Private Attorney Contracts (2015)
Enacts provisions relating to contingent fee contracts between the attorney general and private attorneys.  Places tiered limits on the amount of cont...
Utah
Attorney General Sunshine – S.B. 984
Requires state agencies and officials to use an open request for proposal process when seeking outside counsel in a matter in which attorneys’ fees ma...
Oklahoma


Attorney General Transparency News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Attorney General Transparency

Texas Now on Judicial Hellholes® “Watch List” as Political Lawsuits, Junk Science Spread

The American Tort Reform Foundation today placed Texas on the Judicial Hel...

ATRA Applauds House Oversight Committee Investigation Into the State Energy & Environmental Impact Center at NYU School of Law

The American Tort Reform Association applauds the House Oversight and Gove...

Groups Urge Congressional Scrutiny of D.C. Attorney General’s Use of Private Attorneys

The American Tort Reform Association submitted a letter today to the House...

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Attorney General Transparency
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Oregon Local Legal Services Advertising 2021-2025
Trial lawyers and aggregators increasingly spend large sums of money on television, digital,and print advertising to recruit new clients. In 2025, it...
Oregon
The Junk Science Playbook
The Machine That Sparks and Supports Mass Tort LitigationIntroduction and Executive SummaryMass tort litigation is a sprawling, profit-driven...
Bio-Lab, Inc. v. Fannie Tartt et al.
(GA, filed January 20, 2026): Arguing that traditional tort law and persuasive decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and numerous state high courts do ...
Georgia
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Sanctionable: The unsupported, exaggerated, and suspicious claims plaguing our nation’s courts
There is growing concern that many lawsuits filed in our nation’s courts are unsupported, involve manufactured or exaggerated injuries, or stem from ...
California, Florida, Louisiana, New York, Pennsylvania
Lyon v. Riverside Methodist Hospital et. al.
(OH., filed October 7, 2025): Arguing that the Court should review the lower court’s decision because the Court should comprehensively address the co...
Ohio
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Atlas Turner, Inc. v. Welch
(U.S., filed September 22, 2025): Arguing the Court should review the use of receiverships by the South Carolina asbestos court.  The receivership pr...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Letter to House Judiciary Committee re: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act
This letter was submitted on behalf of the American Tort Reform Association to express our support for H.R. 5437, the “Protection of Lawful Commerce ...
California
Letter to DOJ re: RFI on State Laws Having Significant Adverse Effects on the National Economy or Interstate Commerce
Re: Request for Information on State Laws Having Significant Adverse Effects on the National Economy or Significant Adverse Effects on Interstate Com...
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
(U.S., filed September 12, 2025): Arguing that the Louisiana coastal litigation proves the importance of federal officer removal.  The Government law...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Suncor Energy Inc., et. al. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et. al.
(U.S., filed September 12, 2025): Urging the Court to grant the petition for certiari.  Arguing that global climate change is not traditional state t...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.