Login

Asbestos and Asbestos Trust Transparency

Transparency in asbestos litigation is essential to ensure fair compensation for victims and prevent abuse of trust funds.

The Problem

Many asbestos lawsuits lack transparency, with claimants often filing against multiple trusts without disclosing this information in court. This can lead to inconsistent awards, double-dipping, and depletion of trust funds meant for future claimants.

ATRA’s Position

Require claimants to disclose all trust claims filed, ensuring fair compensation and protecting trust resources for future victims.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Asbestos and Asbestos Trust Transparency

No related legislation or reform items to display.



Asbestos and Asbestos Trust Transparency News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Asbestos and Asbestos Trust Transparency

Judicial Overreach In South Carolina Asbestos Cases Draws National Scrutiny

Today, the American Tort Reform Foundation released its 2024-2025 “Judicia...
Read More

ATRA Hails Alabama as ‘Tort Reform Trailblazer’ After Passing Crucial Asbestos Litigation Reform

Today, the American Tort Reform Association recognized Alabama as a “Tort ...
Read More

South Carolina Grapples with No. 5 Spot in Judicial Hellholes® Ranking

South Carolina finds itself in the spotlight as the American Tort Reform F...
Read More
View All

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Asbestos and Asbestos Trust Transparency
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
In Re Dupont de Nemours and Company C-8 Litigation
(6th Cir., filed June 20, 2016): Arguing that the court improperly blended specific and general causation and that there is a vital distinction betwee...
6th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
View
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby No. 15-513
(U.S., filed August 8, 2016): Arguing that the blatant violation of the “seal” requirement by relator in a false claims case should result in a dismis...
SCOTUS
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
View
Robinson v. Pfizer
(8th. Cir., filed September 12, 2016): Arguing that expansive venue laws has led to venue shopping and abuses in Missouri.  The Court must reign in th...
8th Circuit
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
View
Cerveny v. Aventis
(10th Cir., filed September 19, 2016): Arguing that courts must ask whether federal law authorized the defendant to do what the plaintiff claims state...
10th Circuit
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
View
Hyundai Motor America v. Applewhite
(Miss., filed September 19, 2016): Arguing that under MS statute, evidence of a plaintiff’s nonuse of his seatbelt is admissible to refute a plaintiff...
Mississippi
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
View
Walker v. Ford
(Col., filed September 27, 2016): Arguing that the“risk-benefit” test for strict product liability incorporates the “consumer expectation” test, such ...
Colorado
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
View
Cottrell v. Alcon Laboratories
(3rd Cir., filed September 28, 2016): Arguing that the plaintiffs’ speculative claim that they might have paid less for a medication if defendan...
3rd Circuit
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
View
Eike v. Allergan
(7th Cir., filed October 18, 2016): Arguing that the plaintiffs’ speculative claim that they might have paid less for a medication if defendants...
7th Circuit
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
View
BNSF v. Tyrell
(US., filed October 28, 2016): Arguing that the Montana Supreme Court improperly applied the Daimler personal jurisdiction requirements, which state t...
SCOTUS
  • Court Granted Cert iconCourt Granted Cert
View
In re Zoloft Litigation
(3rd Cir., filed October 18, 2016): Arguing that an expert cannot premise a causation analysis on a single statistically-significant association when ...
3rd Circuit
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position
View



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
Menu
Social Media
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
YouTube
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.