Appeal Bond Reform

Problem

In an era when billion-dollar verdicts are no longer uncommon, appealing a jury verdict can force an individual, a company, or an industry into bankruptcy.

ATRA's Position:

ATRA supports appeal bond reform legislation that limits the size of an appeal bond when a company is not liquidating its assets or attempting to flee from justice.


Opposition Opinion:

The personal injury bar’s argument in support of appeal bonds – that appeal bonds secure damages awards owed to a plaintiff – fails to address the hardship imposed by the bonds on defendants who are forced to choose between risking bankruptcy by posting billion-dollar bonds, many of which are ultimately overturned by an appellate court, and forfeiting their right to appeal.

Appeal Bond Reform: H.B. 3775 (2011)

South Carolina|2011

Limits the amount of an appeal bond to $25 million

[…]

Limits the amount of an appeal bond to $25 million for all judgmnets against defendants with 50+ employees and gross revenue of $5 million, and $1 million for all judgments against all other defendants.


[hide]

Unchallenged

Appeal Bond Reform: H. 4823 (2004)

South Carolina|2004

Provides that judgments are to be stayed during the appeal

[…]

Provides that judgments are to be stayed during the appeal of a judgment by signatories to the Master Settlement Agreement.  Such defendants are not required to post an appeal bond.


[hide]

Unchallenged