Appeal Bond Reform

Many states require defendants to post an appeal bond – sometimes equal to 150 percent of a verdict – in order to secure the right to appeal.

The Problem

In an era when billion-dollar verdicts are no longer uncommon, appealing a jury verdict can force an individual, a company, or an industry into bankruptcy.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports appeal bond reform legislation that limits the size of an appeal bond when a company is not liquidating its assets or attempting to flee from justice.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Appeal Bond Reform
Appeal Bond Reform: (1987)
Repeals Alabama’s affirmance fee rule, which assessed a fee of 10% of the judgment against defendants (but not plaintiffs) who appealed cases an...
Alabama
Appeal Bond Reform: HB 4 (2003)
Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to the lesser of 50% of a defendant’s net worth or $25 million.  Pr...
Texas


Appeal Bond Reform News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Appeal Bond Reform

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Appeal Bond Reform
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
In re Nissan North America Inc.
(6th COA, filed February 2, 2024): Arguing that district courts must conduct a Daubert analysis of expert testimony that provides the evidentiary basi...
6th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Ford Motor Co. v. Hill
(Ga. Ct. App., filed January 19, 2024): Arguing that the “death penalty” sanctions in this case defies any test of proportionality. The sa...
Georgia
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
In re National Opiate Litigation
(Oh., filed January 8, 2024): Arguing that the Ohio Product Liability Act, as amended in 2005 and2007, supersedes this Court’s divided opinion in City...
Ohio
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Coinbase Inc. v. Suski
(U.S., filed December 22, 2023) Arguing that the effect of a subsequent contract on a prior arbitration agreement that remains in effect is a question...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Peninsula Pathology Associates v. American International Industries
(4th Circuit, filed December 20, 2023): Arguing courts must separate sound science from made-for-litigation results.  For courts to diligently exercis...
4th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Alonzo v. John
(Tex., filed December 8, 2023): Arguing that a Court majority opinion should clearly prohibit unsubstantiated anchoring, which produces nuclear verdic...
Texas
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
McKinney v. Goins
(N.C., filed in November 2023): Arguing that the state’s reviver legislation for certain types of claims is unconstitutional. ...
North Carolina
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
In re Purdue Pharma LLP
(U.S., filed October 27, 2023): Arguing that the bankruptcy code authorizes courts to approve nonconsensual third-party release and that third-party r...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Comment in Support of Proposed Amendment to Ohio Rule of Evidence 702
ATRA supports the proposed amendment to more closely align Ohio ATRA supports the proposed amendment to more closely align Ohio Rule of Eviden...
Ohio
Testimony on Proposed New Rule 16.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Outline of American Tort Reform Association Testimony Regarding Proposed New Outline of American Tort Reform Association Testimony R...



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.