Appeal Bond Reform

Many states require defendants to post an appeal bond – sometimes equal to 150 percent of a verdict – in order to secure the right to appeal.

The Problem

In an era when billion-dollar verdicts are no longer uncommon, appealing a jury verdict can force an individual, a company, or an industry into bankruptcy.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports appeal bond reform legislation that limits the size of an appeal bond when a company is not liquidating its assets or attempting to flee from justice.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Appeal Bond Reform
Appeal Bond Reform: SB 2198 (2009)
Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $200 million.  The limit applies to Engle progeny litigation, an...
Florida
Appeal Bond Reform: H.B. 841 (2006); Fla. Stat. § 45.045
Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal in any civil action, except for certified class actions subject 768...
Florida
Appeal Bond Reform: S 2826 (2003); Fla. Stat. § 569.23

Limits the amount that signatories to the Master Settlement Agreement are required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $100 million.

Florida
Appeal Bond Reform: HB 1721 (2000); Fla. Stat. § 215.56005; Amending Fla. Stat. § 17.41
Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal punitive damages awards in class actions to the lesser of 10% of th...
Florida
Appeal Bond Reform: HB 1366 (2003); Amended C.R.S. 13-16-125

Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $25 million.

Colorado
Appeal Bond Reform: AB 1752 (2003)
Limits the amount a signatory to the Master Settlement Agreement can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $150 million and applies to a...
California
Appeal Bond Reform: S.B. 1212 (2011), A.R.S. § 12-2108
Limits the amount of an appeal bond to the lesser of the total amount of damages awarded excluding punitive damages, 50% of the appellant’s net ...
Arizona
Appeal Bond Reform: S.B. 937 (2005)

Broadened 2003 law to apply to all causes of action regardless of when they accrued.

Arkansas
Appeal Bond Reform: HB 1038 (2003)

Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $25 million.

Arkansas
Appeal Bond Reform: H.B. 220 (2006); Code of Ala. § 6-12-4

Limits the amount a signatory to the Master Settlement Agreement can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $125 million.

Alabama


Appeal Bond Reform News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Appeal Bond Reform

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Appeal Bond Reform
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Campaign Finance Analysis – Plaintiffs’ Firms and PAC Contributions — California – 2017-2023
The American Tort Reform Association’s campaign finance analysis report on plaintiffs’ firms and PAC contributions in California, 2017-202...
California
Legal Services Advertising – California – 2019-2023
In 2023, it is estimated that $2.4 billion was spent on more than 26 million local legal services television, radio, print ads or billboards solicitin...
California
Gilead Tenofovir Cases, Gilead Sciences v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
(Ca., filed March 13, 2024): Urging the court to review the lower court’s decision to adopt an innovative theory of liability. The California Court of...
California
  • Court Granted Cert iconCourt Granted Cert
Campaign Finance Analysis – Plaintiffs’ Firms and PAC Contributions — Nevada – 2017-2023
The American Tort Reform Association’s campaign finance analysis report on plaintiffs’ firms and PAC contributions in Nevada, 2017-2023.  ...
Nevada
Legal Services Advertising – Nevada – 2019-2023
The American Tort Reform Association’s latest report analyzing legal services advertising in Nevada 2019-2023.In 2023, it is estimated that $2.4 billi...
Nevada
Legal Services Advertising – New York – 2019-2023
In 2023, it is estimated that $2.4 billion was spent on more than 26 million local legal services television, radio, print ads or billboards solicitin...
New York
Campaign Finance Analysis – Plaintiffs’ Firms and PAC Contributions — New York – 2017-2023
The American Tort Reform Association’s campaign finance analysis report on plaintiffs’ firms and PAC contributions in New York, 2017-2023....
New York
In Re FirstEnergy Corporation Securities Litigation
(6th COA, filed February 16, 2024): Arguing that the district court’s erroneous expansion of affiliated ute undermines the reliance requirements...
6th Circuit
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Speerly v. General Motors
(6th COA, filed February 21, 2024): Arguing that the district court erred in certifying these substantiallyuninjured classes. This Court should confir...
6th Circuit
  • Court Ruled Against ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled Against ATRA's Position
Ford v. Parks
(Tx., filed February 8, 2024): Arguing that Ford Motor Company’s “release” of a vehicle constitutes a “sale” under the p...
Texas
  • Court Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position iconCourt Ruled in Favor of ATRA's Position



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.