Appeal Bond Reform

Many states require defendants to post an appeal bond – sometimes equal to 150 percent of a verdict – in order to secure the right to appeal.

The Problem

In an era when billion-dollar verdicts are no longer uncommon, appealing a jury verdict can force an individual, a company, or an industry into bankruptcy.

ATRA’s Position

ATRA supports appeal bond reform legislation that limits the size of an appeal bond when a company is not liquidating its assets or attempting to flee from justice.

Search Through ATRA Reforms

Search through all of ATRA's reforms around Appeal Bond Reform
Appeal Bond Reform: H.B. 194 (2007)

Limits the amount of an appeal bond to $50 million for all judgments against all defendants.

West Virginia
Appeal Bond Reform: A.B. 548 (2003)

Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $100 million.

Wisconsin
Appeal Bond Reform: S.B. 6541 (2006)

Limits the amount a signatory to the Master Settlement Agreement can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $100 million.

Washington
Appeal Bond Reform: SB 671: (2004)

Broadens the $100 million limit from 2001 to include punitive damage awards.

West Virginia
Appeal Bond Reform: SB 661 (2001)
Limits the amount a signatory to the Master Settlement Agreement can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $100 million.  This limit app...
West Virginia
Appeal Bond Reform: H.B. 430/S.B. 172 (2004)

Expands limit of $25 million on appeal bond amounts for punitive damages to apply to appeal bond amounts for all forms of damages.

Virginia
Appeal Bond Reform: HB 1547 (2000)
Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal a punitive damages award to $25 million.  Applies in out‑of‑state j...
Virginia
Appeal Bond Reform: Sup. Ct. Order 2005-03-22 (2005)
The Utah Supreme Court imposed a limit on the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal by amending UCRP governing appea...
Utah
Appeal Bond Reform: HB 2008 / SB 1522 (2011); Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-1-124

Lowers the amount a defendant can be required to pay to appeal a decision from $75 million to $25 million not to exceed 125% of the judgment.

Tennessee
Intermediate Court of Appeals – S.B. 275 (2021)
Establishes an intermediate court of appeals in the State of West Virginia. Prior to enactment of this legislation, the state did not have an inter...
West Virginia


Appeal Bond Reform News and Press

Explore ATRA's most recent press releases and blogs around Appeal Bond Reform

Search Resources

Search through all of ATRA's Amicus Briefs, Reports, and Other Resources around Appeal Bond Reform
Search All
States
Status
Post Types
Date
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et. al.
(U.S., filed May 18, 2026): Arguing the state law does not provide a mechanism to recover damages for costs attributed to global climate change. Clim...
SCOTUS
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Veto Request, House Bill 26-1236, “Arbitration Reform”
...
Colorado
Second Letter Urging Veto of HB 449 / SB 229 Following Rejection of Amendments
...
Virginia
Comment by Leading Defense Bar and Business Groups Opposing Nonlawyer Ownership and Fee-Sharing
Tennessee Supreme Court comment by leading business and defense bar groups opposing nonlawyer law firm ownership – 4.30.2026Download ...
Tennessee
Blade v. Sig Saurer
(E.D. Pa., filed April 6, 2026): Arguing that the court should grant Sig Saurer’s motion for reconsideration because Mallory upends the jurisdictiona...
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Suquilanda v. Skyway Roofing, Inc.
(Ma., filed March 18, 2026): Urging the court to decline to recognize a new cause of action permitting employees of a subcontractor to sue a contract...
Massachusetts
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided
Letter Urging Veto or Amendments to House Bill 449 / Senate Bill 229 in Virginia
...
Virginia
Corporate Flight from Delaware: The Impact of Escalating Shareholder Litigation and Legal Uncertainty
Unpredictable court rulings and a wave of lawyer-driven, profit-seeking litigation are destabilizing Delaware’s historic dominance for corporat...
Delaware
New York Local Legal Services Advertising 2024-2025
Trial lawyers and aggregators increasingly spend large sums of money on television, digital, and print advertising to recruit new clients. In 2025, i...
New York
Murphy v. Rio Rancho Center
(New Mex. Ct. App., filed March 5, 2026): Arguing that the double-digit punitive multipliers likely violate due process. The U.S. Supreme Court has s...
New Mexico
  • Case Not Yet Decided iconCase Not Yet Decided



The American Tort Reform Association is the nation’s first organization dedicated exclusively to reforming the civil justice system through education and legislative enactment.

To receive occasional updates from ATRA, enter your email address:
By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.
© 2026 ATRA. All rights reserved.