‘Highly Unusual’ Rehearing of Louisiana Case Raises Judicial Independence Concerns
Louisiana Supreme Court Waffles Under Political Pressure, ATRA Brief Urges Court to Stand Strong
The People of the State of Michigan v. Eli Lilly & Co.
(MI., filed May 1, 2024): Arguing that the Michigan Supreme Court correctly decided previous cases based on the plain language of Michigan’s consumer protection statute. The Court held that the MCPA bars lawsuits against companies doing business in Michigan when they are already specifically regulated under other laws and regulations. The principles of stare decisis require retention of the stable, workable precedent of the Court and the precedent strikes the right balance between protecting consumers without overburdening Michigan’s extensively regulated business and service providers.
Latest News
View all news
America’s Top 9 Worst Judicial Hellholes®
Left unchecked, these jurisdictions will continue dragging down economic growth and undermining justice through rampant lawsuit abuse.
ATRA Commends J&J’s Plan to Resolve Notorious Talc Lawsuits
Claimants Given Opportunity to Vote on Plan; Judge to Reconsider Scientific Validity of Plaintiffs’ Experts
The Lab Whose Junk Science Is Fueling a Frenzy of Litigation
Legitimate consumer protection demands sound science and impartial analysis — not distorted data designed to manufacture lawsuits.
Lawsuit Advertising Frenzy Fuels Georgia’s Litigation Epidemic
Law Firms Spent $168M+ on 2.2M Ads in Georgia
Trial Lawyers’ Dual Grip on Pennsylvania Politics and Public Opinion Revealed in New ATRA Reports
ATRA’s Latest Studies Reveal Financial Influence and Lack of Transparency in Pennsylvania’s Campaign Finance Systems