Oklahoma v. Johnson & Johnson
(Ok., filed October 19, 2020): Arguing that the trial court inappropriately expanded the state’s public nuisance law. The trial court jettisoned traditional limitations on nuisance law and endorsed a public-nuisance theory that would virtually guarantee limitless liability for Oklahoma businesses. The trial court unfairly and unconstitutionally pinned the claimed financial costs of the opioid crisis on a single defendant.
Download Amicus Brief As Filed
Latest News
View all news
RFK Jr.’s Trial Lawyer Ties Raise Red Flags
We must ensure that all future health decisions are made with the best interests of all Americans in mind — not the financial motives of profit-seeking plaintiffs’ lawyers.
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp Unveils Robust Tort Reform Package to Address Skyrocketing Costs
Proposed Reforms Aim to Slash $1,372 Annual ‘Tort Tax’ for Every Georgian
Louisiana’s “Judicial Hellhole®” Status Costs Residents $965 Annually In “Tort Tax”
Nuclear Verdicts® and Insurance Fraud Plague State’s Legal System
King County Courts Named ‘Judicial Hellhole®’ for First Time
New Report Ranks Seattle-Area Courts Among Worst in US
Michigan’s Legal Climate Kills 97,000 Jobs Annually, New Report Reveals
$1,046/Person ‘Tort Tax’ — Court Expands Liability, Michiganders Pay
Show Me Your Lawsuit: St. Louis Ranks 7th in ‘Judicial Hellholes®’ Report
Courts Threaten Preemie Formula Access, Residents Pay $1,475/Person/Year ‘Tort Tax’